Whether trees are considered an asset to a development or not, they become problematic during the permitting process – many times a significant liability.
There are always two issues associated with trees and permitting, tree ordinances and the people involved with the process. Both issues can be daunting.
Tree ordinances are guidelines to tree preservation. Too often they are viewed as rules. Tree ordinances are designed as a compromise between two extremes: clear cutting and unrealistic expectations of preservation. A careful examination of a tree ordinance reveals a matrix of choices which trigger certain events.
Now enter the emotions of people and trees. Emotional reactions to tree removal, replacement and mitigation are difficult, if not impossible to ameliorate.
There are always two paths to resolution. One can be found in science, or in other words, tree biology. The other solution can be found in presenting scientific facts to people to better implement the provisions of tree ordinances.
Science relates to definitions while applied tree biology relates to diminution in value. People relate to the big picture of preservation and sustainable urban forestry, whereas tree ordinances do not.